Inventor Resources

The Implications of United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. ___ (2021)

  The Implications of United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. ___ (2021) Background In Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., the United States Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of the appointments of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), concluding that the APJs are \”principal officers\” of the

The Implications of United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. ___ (2021) Read More »

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Sanctions (PTAB): What You Need to Know

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Sanctions: What You Need to Know In inter partes review, covered business method and post-grant review proceedings, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) may impose sanctions on a party if that party is found to have committed misconduct during a review. Sanctions can include monetary penalties, exclusion from participation in

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Sanctions (PTAB): What You Need to Know Read More »

ITC Litigation and Section 337 Proceedings

ITC Litigation and Section 337 Proceedings The Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. $ 1337) gives the International Trade Commission (\”ITC\”) exclusive jurisdiction over certain intellectual property disputes. These proceedings have become increasingly popular because they typically resolve themselves far faster than going to trial in Federal Court. An ITC litigation attorney requires an understanding

ITC Litigation and Section 337 Proceedings Read More »

Covered Business Method Review

A Covered Business Method Review (CBM Review) is a type of post-grant proceeding available under the America Invents Act (AIA). CBM Reviews are intended to provide a quicker and cheaper alternative to traditional patent litigation for challenging the validity of covered business method patents. To initiate a CBM Review, a petitioner must file a petition

Covered Business Method Review Read More »

Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts Partners with UMass Lowell Innovation Hub to Host Entrepreneur Forum

In partnership with UMass Lowell Innovation Hub, attorneys from Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts LLP hosted a digital meeting for entrepreneurs interested in forming an IP strategy to protect their inventions and to gain venture capital while trying to maintain a budget required to execute the strategy.  Tim Collins, Allie Scoville, and Victor Baranowski presented at

Schmeiser, Olsen & Watts Partners with UMass Lowell Innovation Hub to Host Entrepreneur Forum Read More »