IP Professionals

Preparing for 2024: The Changing Landscape of IP Law

As we navigate the digital age, the field of Intellectual Property (IP) law is undergoing significant and unprecedented changes. These alterations to the legal landscape are driven by several factors, including emerging trends in technology such as artificial intelligence (AI), the evolving landscape of e-commerce, and the rise of counterfeit products. This article will focus […]

Preparing for 2024: The Changing Landscape of IP Law Read More »

Overcoming 101 Rejections for Computer and Electronics Related Patents

Understanding 101 rejections is pivotal in the realm of patent law, particularly for computer and electronics-related patents. A 101 rejection is issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when the patent examiner deems the claimed invention does not meet the eligibility criteria for patentable subject matter. This typically occurs when the claimed

Overcoming 101 Rejections for Computer and Electronics Related Patents Read More »

How the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 Will Affect Inventors

The Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 will mark a significant shift in intellectual property rights in the United States. The Act will aim to restore and enhance patent eligibility, offering greater protection to inventors and fostering an environment conducive to innovation. The State of Patent Eligibility before the Act Before the enactment of the

How the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 Will Affect Inventors Read More »

Reimagining the Intellectual Property Terrain: The Impact of the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act

Before the enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) in 2011, the United States followed a “first to invent” principle in its patent laws, which often led to protracted and convoluted legal battles over patent ownership. This environment was not only cost-intensive but also stifled innovation, as inventors and small businesses were deterred by

Reimagining the Intellectual Property Terrain: The Impact of the 2011 Leahy-Smith America Invents Act Read More »

Can you file a Late US National Stage Entry of Paris Convention application claiming priority to US application?

Are you considering filing a patent application under the Paris Convention or 35 USC 119? If so, you may be wondering if it\’s possible to file a late US National Stage Entry while claiming priority to your foreign priority application. The answer is yes, but there are certain criteria and procedures that must be followed in order for

Can you file a Late US National Stage Entry of Paris Convention application claiming priority to US application? Read More »

Can you file a Late US National Stage Entry of Patent Cooperation Treaty application with Foreign Priority Claims in the United States? Steps to Recover from Missed Deadlines

Filing a Late US National Stage Entry of Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) application with foreign priority claims can be complicated and intimidating. With the various deadlines, requirements, and applications that must be filed in order to obtain patent protection, it is easy to make mistakes or miss crucial deadlines. Fortunately, there are ways to recover

Can you file a Late US National Stage Entry of Patent Cooperation Treaty application with Foreign Priority Claims in the United States? Steps to Recover from Missed Deadlines Read More »

Ensure the Long-Term Growth and Security of Your Company with Professional IP Law Services

Intellectual property (IP) law is the body of law that protects the rights of creators, inventors and businesses with respect to the legal protection of their intellectual property assets. These include trademarks, copyrights, patents and trade secrets. IP protection helps ensure that ideas are valued and protected so businesses can achieve long-term success. By working

Ensure the Long-Term Growth and Security of Your Company with Professional IP Law Services Read More »

The Implications of United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. ___ (2021)

  The Implications of United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. ___ (2021) Background In Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., the United States Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of the appointments of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), concluding that the APJs are \”principal officers\” of the

The Implications of United States v. Arthrex, Inc., 594 U.S. ___ (2021) Read More »